Product comparison · 2 coffee grinders

De’Longhi KG200 Black vs WMF Lumero 04.1708.0071 coffee grinder

Add a product
  • 12specifications compared
  • 8differ
  • 4identical
  • 23known for one product only

Key differences

The WMF Lumero 04.1708.0071 coffee grinder has 60 g more coffee beans capacity than the De’Longhi KG200 Black (150 g vs 90 g). The WMF Lumero 04.1708.0071 coffee grinder has 197 mm more depth than the De’Longhi KG200 Black (307 mm vs 110 mm). The WMF Lumero 04.1708.0071 coffee grinder has 71.7 mm more height than the De’Longhi KG200 Black (321.7 mm vs 250 mm). Product type: Blade grinder on the De’Longhi KG200 Black, Burr grinder on the WMF Lumero 04.1708.0071 coffee grinder. Material: Plastic on the De’Longhi KG200 Black, Plastic, Stainless steel on the WMF Lumero 04.1708.0071 coffee grinder.

  • Product type
    • KG200 Black:Blade grinder
    • Lumero 04.1708.0071 coffee grinder:Burr grinder
  • Coffee beans capacity
    • KG200 Black:90 g
    • Lumero 04.1708.0071 coffee grinder:150 g
  • Material
    • KG200 Black:Plastic
    • Lumero 04.1708.0071 coffee grinder:Plastic, Stainless steel
  • Number of cups
    • KG200 Black:12 pc(s)
    • Lumero 04.1708.0071 coffee grinder:2 pc(s)
  • Depth
    • KG200 Black:110 mm
    • Lumero 04.1708.0071 coffee grinder:307 mm
  • Height
    • KG200 Black:250 mm
    • Lumero 04.1708.0071 coffee grinder:321.7 mm
  • Weight
    • KG200 Black:1 kg
    • Lumero 04.1708.0071 coffee grinder:2.83 kg
  • Width
    • KG200 Black:130 mm
    • Lumero 04.1708.0071 coffee grinder:126.4 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of KG200, 04.1708.0071
35 specifications
A

De’Longhi

KG200 Black

Model KG200

View product
Features4 differ
Product typeDiffersBlade grinderBurr grinder
Coffee beans capacityDiffers90 g150 g
Adjustable grinder settingsYesYes
Built-in dispenserYesYes
Burr typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceConical burr
Burr materialKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceStainless steel
Removable bean hopperYesYes
Dishwasher-proof partsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Product colourBlackBlack
Auto power offKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Easy to cleanKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Indication lightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
MaterialDiffersPlasticPlastic, Stainless steel
Number of cupsDiffers12 pc(s)2 pc(s)
Number of grinder settingsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source40
On/off switchKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Stainless steel bladesKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
PowerKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source150 W
Power plug typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceType C
Weight & dimensions4 differ
Cord lengthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1 m
DepthDiffers110 mm307 mm
HeightDiffers250 mm321.7 mm
WeightDiffers1 kg2.83 kg
WidthDiffers130 mm126.4 mm
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source366 mm
Package depthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source339 mm
Package heightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source139 mm
Package weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source4.21 kg
Logistics dataidentical
Layers per palletKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2 pc(s)
Products per palletKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source24 pc(s)
Products per pallet layerKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source12 pc(s)
Products per intermodal container (20ft)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1350 pc(s)
Products per intermodal container (40ft)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2904 pc(s)
Packaging contentidentical
Quantity per packKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1 pc(s)
Cleaning brushKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More coffee grinder comparisons

All coffee grinder comparisons