Product comparison · 2 cellular network devices

Philips PAC030/93 cellular network device Cellular wireless network equipment vs Zyxel LTE7240-M403 Cellular network router

2specifications compared
2differ
0identical
24known for one product only

Key differences

The Zyxel LTE7240-M403 Cellular network router has 720 g more weight than the Philips PAC030/93 cellular network device Cellular wireless network equipment (800 g vs 80 g). Device type: Cellular wireless network equipment on the Philips PAC030/93 cellular network device Cellular wireless network equipment, Cellular network router on the Zyxel LTE7240-M403 Cellular network router.

Weight
- PAC030/93 cellular network device Cellular wireless network equipment:80 g
- LTE7240-M403 Cellular network router:800 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of PAC030/93, LTE7240-M403
26 specifications	A Philips PAC030/93 cellular network device Cellular wireless network equipment Model PAC030/93 View product	B Zyxel LTE7240-M403 Cellular network router Model LTE7240-M403 View product
Design1 differ
Device typeDiffers	Cellular wireless network equipment	Cellular network router
Product colourKnown for one	White	Unknown — not stated by the source
Market positioningKnown for one	Portable	Unknown — not stated by the source
Display diagonalKnown for one	2.31 cm (0.91")	Unknown — not stated by the source
Wireless LAN featuresidentical
Wi-FiKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
WLAN data transfer rates supportedKnown for one	150 Mbit/s	Unknown — not stated by the source
Mobile networkidentical
Data networkKnown for one	3G, CDMA, LTE	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfacesidentical
Card reader integratedKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Compatible memory cardsKnown for one	MicroSD (TransFlash)	Unknown — not stated by the source
Batteryidentical
Battery technologyKnown for one	Lithium Polymer (LiPo)	Unknown — not stated by the source
Battery capacityKnown for one	3800 mAh	Unknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
USB poweredKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power source typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	PoE
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WidthKnown for one	89 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
DepthKnown for one	89 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
HeightKnown for one	24 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
WeightDiffers	80 g	800 g
Ethernet LAN featuresidentical
Ethernet LAN data ratesKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	10,100,1000 Mbit/s
Securityidentical
IP address filteringKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Port forwardingKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Performanceidentical
Antenna gain level (max)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	7 dBi
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5 - 95%
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	-20 - 60 °C
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5 - 95%
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	-90 - 70 °C
Logistics dataidentical
Harmonized System (HS) codeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	85176990

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More cellular network device comparisons

All cellular network device comparisons