All categories
Phones & WearablesView all 31

Departments

Phones & WearablesComputers & TabletsComponents & StorageNetworkingPrinting & OfficePower & ChargingTV, Audio & VideoGaming, Toys & RobotsKitchen AppliancesHome AppliancesPersonal Care & HealthSmart Home & SecurityCar & MobilityTools & GardenCameras & Photo

Shopping country

Browse

All categoriesCompare products

Product comparison · 2 cellular network devices

NETGEAR MR6450 Cellular network router vs TP-Link M7352 cellular network device

Add a product
  • 15specifications compared
  • 9differ
  • 6identical
  • 31known for one product only

Key differences

The NETGEAR MR6450 Cellular network router has 3.6 GHz more Wi-Fi frequency than the TP-Link M7352 cellular network device (6 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The NETGEAR MR6450 Cellular network router has 2,940 mAh more battery capacity than the TP-Link M7352 cellular network device (5040 mAh vs 2100 mAh). The TP-Link M7352 cellular network device has 1 mm more width than the NETGEAR MR6450 Cellular network router (106 mm vs 105 mm). Data network: 3G, 4G, 5G, LTE on the NETGEAR MR6450 Cellular network router, 3G, 4G on the TP-Link M7352 cellular network device. 4G standard: LTE on the NETGEAR MR6450 Cellular network router, LTE-TDD & LTE-FDD on the TP-Link M7352 cellular network device.

  • Wi-Fi frequency
    • 6 GHz
    • 2.4 GHz
  • Data network
    • 3G, 4G, 5G, LTE
    • 3G, 4G
  • 4G standard
    • LTE
    • LTE-TDD & LTE-FDD
  • Battery capacity
    • 5040 mAh
    • 2100 mAh
  • Antenna type
    • External
    • Internal
  • Width
    • 105 mm
    • 106 mm
  • Depth
    • 105 mm
    • 66 mm
  • Height
    • 21.5 mm
    • 16.7 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only
46 specifications
A

NETGEAR

MR6450 Cellular network router

Model MR6450

View product
B

TP-Link

M7352 cellular network device

Model M7352

View product
Designidentical
Reset buttonKnown for oneYes
LED indicatorsKnown for oneYes
Device typeKnown for oneCellular network router
Suitable for indoor useKnown for oneYes
Ethernet LAN featuresidentical
Ethernet LANKnown for oneNo
DHCP clientKnown for oneYes
DHCP serverKnown for oneYes
Wireless LAN features2 differ
Wi-Fi standardsDiffersWi-Fi 6E (802.11ax)802.11a, 802.11b, 802.11g, Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n), Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax)
WLAN data transfer rates supportedKnown for one150 Mbit/s
Wi-Fi frequencyDiffers6 GHz2.4 GHz
Mobile network2 differ
Data networkDiffers3G, 4G, 5G, LTE3G, 4G
3G standardsKnown for oneHSPA+, HSPA, UMTS
4G standardDiffersLTELTE-TDD & LTE-FDD
4G bands supportedKnown for one2600,2300,2500,1800,800,850,700,900 MHz
UMTS bands supportedKnown for one2100,850,900 MHz
Number of SIM cardsKnown for one1
Ports & interfacesidentical
Card reader integratedKnown for oneYes
Compatible memory cardsKnown for oneMicroSD (TransFlash)
Maximum memory card sizeKnown for one2 TB
USB portKnown for oneYes
Securityidentical
Security algorithmsKnown for oneWPA-PSK, WPA2-PSK, WPA3
Battery1 differ
Battery capacityDiffers5040 mAh2100 mAh
Battery technologyKnown for oneLithium-Ion (Li-Ion)
Certificatesidentical
Compliance certificatesKnown for oneCE, RoHS
Networkidentical
Download speedKnown for one150Mbps
Upload speedKnown for one50Mbps
Performance1 differ
Antenna typeDiffersExternalInternal
Mac operating systems supportedKnown for oneMacOS
Windows operating systems supportedKnown for oneWindows 10, Windows 8, Windows Vista, Windows XP
Mobile operating systems supportedKnown for oneAndroid, iOS
Antenna connector typeKnown for oneTS-9
Antennas quantityKnown for one2
Detachable antenna(s)Known for oneYes
Poweridentical
Built-in batteryKnown for oneYes
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one10 - 90%
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one0 - 35 °C
Weight & dimensions3 differ
WidthDiffers105 mm106 mm
DepthDiffers105 mm66 mm
HeightDiffers21.5 mm16.7 mm
WeightKnown for one256 g

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More cellular network device comparisons

All cellular network device comparisons