Product comparison · 2 cellular network devices

NETGEAR Nighthawk 5G M7 Mobile WiFi 7 Router with eSIM vs NETGEAR MR6450 Cellular network router

Add a product
  • 14specifications compared
  • 8differ
  • 6identical
  • 13known for one product only

Key differences

The NETGEAR MR6450 Cellular network router has 1,190 mAh more battery capacity than the NETGEAR Nighthawk 5G M7 Mobile WiFi 7 Router with eSIM (5040 mAh vs 3850 mAh). The NETGEAR MR6450 Cellular network router has 21.4 mm more width than the NETGEAR Nighthawk 5G M7 Mobile WiFi 7 Router with eSIM (105 mm vs 83.6 mm). The NETGEAR MR6450 Cellular network router has 88.1 mm more depth than the NETGEAR Nighthawk 5G M7 Mobile WiFi 7 Router with eSIM (105 mm vs 16.9 mm). Device type: Cellular network module on the NETGEAR Nighthawk 5G M7 Mobile WiFi 7 Router with eSIM, Cellular network router on the NETGEAR MR6450 Cellular network router. Wi-Fi standards: Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be) on the NETGEAR Nighthawk 5G M7 Mobile WiFi 7 Router with eSIM, Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax) on the NETGEAR MR6450 Cellular network router.

  • Device type
    • Nighthawk 5G M7 Mobile WiFi 7 Router with eSIM:Cellular network module
    • MR6450 Cellular network router:Cellular network router
  • Wi-Fi standards
    • Nighthawk 5G M7 Mobile WiFi 7 Router with eSIM:Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be)
    • MR6450 Cellular network router:Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax)
  • Data network
    • Nighthawk 5G M7 Mobile WiFi 7 Router with eSIM:4G, 5G
    • MR6450 Cellular network router:3G, 4G, 5G, LTE
  • Battery capacity
    • Nighthawk 5G M7 Mobile WiFi 7 Router with eSIM:3850 mAh
    • MR6450 Cellular network router:5040 mAh
  • Width
    • Nighthawk 5G M7 Mobile WiFi 7 Router with eSIM:83.6 mm
    • MR6450 Cellular network router:105 mm
  • Depth
    • Nighthawk 5G M7 Mobile WiFi 7 Router with eSIM:16.9 mm
    • MR6450 Cellular network router:105 mm
  • Height
    • Nighthawk 5G M7 Mobile WiFi 7 Router with eSIM:145 mm
    • MR6450 Cellular network router:21.5 mm
  • Weight
    • Nighthawk 5G M7 Mobile WiFi 7 Router with eSIM:240 g
    • MR6450 Cellular network router:256 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of MH7150, MR6450
27 specifications
Design1 differ
Device typeDiffersCellular network moduleCellular network router
Market positioningKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourcePortable
Suitable for indoor useKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Wireless LAN features1 differ
Wi-Fi standardsDiffersWi-Fi 7 (802.11be)Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax)
Wi-Fi frequencyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source6 GHz
Wi-Fi bandKnown for oneDual-band (2.4 GHz / 5 GHz)Unknown — not stated by the source
Mobile network1 differ
Data networkDiffers4G, 5G3G, 4G, 5G, LTE
5G standardKnown for oneNRUnknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfacesidentical
USB port typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceUSB Type-C
USB portKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Battery1 differ
Battery capacityDiffers3850 mAh5040 mAh
Performanceidentical
Antenna typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceExternal
Antenna connector typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceTS-9
Antennas quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2
Detachable antenna(s)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Poweridentical
Built-in batteryKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers83.6 mm105 mm
DepthDiffers16.9 mm105 mm
HeightDiffers145 mm21.5 mm
WeightDiffers240 g256 g
Ethernet LAN featuresidentical
Ethernet LANKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More cellular network device comparisons

All cellular network device comparisons