Product comparison · 2 cellular network devices

HP Mobile Hot Spot vs NETGEAR AirCard 790

10specifications compared
6differ
4identical
5known for one product only

Key differences

The NETGEAR AirCard 790 has 1,430 mAh more battery capacity than the HP Mobile Hot Spot (2930 mAh vs 1500 mAh). The HP Mobile Hot Spot has 28.8 mm more width than the NETGEAR AirCard 790 (96.8 mm vs 68 mm). The NETGEAR AirCard 790 has 52 mm more depth than the HP Mobile Hot Spot (110 mm vs 58 mm). Data network: Edge, GPRS, GSM, HSPA, HSPA+, UMTS on the HP Mobile Hot Spot, 3G, 4G on the NETGEAR AirCard 790.

Battery capacity
- Mobile Hot Spot:1500 mAh
- AirCard 790:2930 mAh
Width
- Mobile Hot Spot:96.8 mm
- AirCard 790:68 mm
Depth
- Mobile Hot Spot:58 mm
- AirCard 790:110 mm
Height
- Mobile Hot Spot:12.8 mm
- AirCard 790:15 mm
Weight
- Mobile Hot Spot:75 g
- AirCard 790:136 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of Mobile Hot Spot, AirCard 790
15 specifications	A HP Mobile Hot Spot View product	B NETGEAR AirCard 790 View product
Designidentical
Display diagonalKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	6.1 cm (2.4")
Mobile network1 differ
Data networkDiffers	Edge, GPRS, GSM, HSPA, HSPA+, UMTS	3G, 4G
Battery1 differ
Battery technologyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Lithium-Ion (Li-Ion)
Battery capacityDiffers	1500 mAh	2930 mAh
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0 - 35 °C
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers	96.8 mm	68 mm
DepthDiffers	58 mm	110 mm
HeightDiffers	12.8 mm	15 mm
WeightDiffers	75 g	136 g
Ports & interfacesidentical
USB portKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Other featuresidentical
Compatible operating systemsKnown for one	Windows 7, Windows 8, Windows 8.1 (does not support Windows RT), Windows 10, Windows Vista SP1, Windows XP Vista SP2	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More cellular network device comparisons

All cellular network device comparisons