Product comparison · 2 card readers

Integral USB 3.0 CARD READER TYPE A & TYPE C DUAL SLOT SD MICRO SD A2 ETAIL vs Integral USB 3.0 CARD READER TWIN SLOT SD MICRO SD V3 ETAIL

Add a product
  • 12specifications compared
  • 4differ
  • 8identical
  • 3known for one product only

Key differences

The Integral USB 3.0 CARD READER TYPE A & TYPE C DUAL SLOT SD MICRO SD A2 ETAIL has 11 g more package weight than the Integral USB 3.0 CARD READER TWIN SLOT SD MICRO SD V3 ETAIL (48 g vs 37 g). The Integral USB 3.0 CARD READER TWIN SLOT SD MICRO SD V3 ETAIL has 100 mm more master (outer) case height than the Integral USB 3.0 CARD READER TYPE A & TYPE C DUAL SLOT SD MICRO SD A2 ETAIL (280 mm vs 180 mm).

  • Package weight
    • USB 3.0 CARD READER TYPE A & TYPE C DUAL SLOT SD MICRO SD A2 ETAIL:48 g
    • USB 3.0 CARD READER TWIN SLOT SD MICRO SD V3 ETAIL:37 g
  • Master (outer) case height
    • USB 3.0 CARD READER TYPE A & TYPE C DUAL SLOT SD MICRO SD A2 ETAIL:180 mm
    • USB 3.0 CARD READER TWIN SLOT SD MICRO SD V3 ETAIL:280 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of INCRUSB3.0ACSDMSDA2, INCRUSB3.0SDMSDV3
15 specifications
Performance1 differ
Compatible memory cardsDiffersMicroSD (TransFlash), MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC, SD, SDHC, SDXCMicroSD (TransFlash), SD, SDHC, SDXC
Packaging data1 differ
Package widthKnown for one93 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package depthKnown for one137 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one8 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package weightDiffers48 g37 g
System requirements1 differ
Compatible operating systemsDiffersWindows 10 & 11 Mac OS 09 and later, Linux v2.4.0 and aboveWindows 10 & 11, Mac OS 09 and later, Linux v2.4.0 and above
Logistics data1 differ
Master (outer) case heightDiffers180 mm280 mm

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More card reader comparisons

All card reader comparisons