Product comparison · 2 card readers

Integral USB 3.0 CARD READER SINGLE SLOT CFEXPRESS WITH TYPE C TO A AND C TO C CABLES ETAIL vs Integral USB 3.0 CARD READER TWIN SLOT SD MICRO SD V3 ETAIL

Add a product
  • 9specifications compared
  • 2differ
  • 7identical
  • 6known for one product only

Key differences

The Integral USB 3.0 CARD READER SINGLE SLOT CFEXPRESS WITH TYPE C TO A AND C TO C CABLES ETAIL has 91 g more package weight than the Integral USB 3.0 CARD READER TWIN SLOT SD MICRO SD V3 ETAIL (128 g vs 37 g). Compatible memory cards: CFexpress 2.0 Type B on the Integral USB 3.0 CARD READER SINGLE SLOT CFEXPRESS WITH TYPE C TO A AND C TO C CABLES ETAIL, MicroSD (TransFlash), SD, SDHC, SDXC on the Integral USB 3.0 CARD READER TWIN SLOT SD MICRO SD V3 ETAIL.

  • Package weight
    • USB 3.0 CARD READER SINGLE SLOT CFEXPRESS WITH TYPE C TO A AND C TO C CABLES ETAIL:128 g
    • USB 3.0 CARD READER TWIN SLOT SD MICRO SD V3 ETAIL:37 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of INCRUSB3.0ACCFEV2, INCRUSB3.0SDMSDV3
15 specifications
Performance1 differ
Compatible memory cardsDiffersCFexpress 2.0 Type BMicroSD (TransFlash), SD, SDHC, SDXC
Packaging data1 differ
Package widthKnown for one140 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package depthKnown for one200 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one14 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package weightDiffers128 g37 g
Logistics dataidentical
Master (outer) case widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source310 mm
Master (outer) case lengthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source400 mm
Master (outer) case heightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source280 mm

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More card reader comparisons

All card reader comparisons