Product comparison · 2 card readers

InLine Card reader USB 3.2 USB-C or USB-A, for CFexpress type B cards vs Ugreen 80888 card reader USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Black, Metallic

Add a product
  • 9specifications compared
  • 6differ
  • 3identical
  • 13known for one product only

Key differences

The InLine Card reader USB 3.2 USB-C or USB-A, for CFexpress type B cards has 9,900 Mbit/s more data transfer rate than the Ugreen 80888 card reader USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Black, Metallic (10000 Mbit/s vs 100 Mbit/s). The InLine Card reader USB 3.2 USB-C or USB-A, for CFexpress type B cards has 23 mm more width than the Ugreen 80888 card reader USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Black, Metallic (57 mm vs 34 mm). The InLine Card reader USB 3.2 USB-C or USB-A, for CFexpress type B cards has 6.9 mm more depth than the Ugreen 80888 card reader USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Black, Metallic (63 mm vs 56.1 mm). Compatible memory cards: CFexpress on the InLine Card reader USB 3.2 USB-C or USB-A, for CFexpress type B cards, MicroSD (TransFlash), SD on the Ugreen 80888 card reader USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Black, Metallic. Product colour: Aluminium, Black on the InLine Card reader USB 3.2 USB-C or USB-A, for CFexpress type B cards, Black, Metallic on the Ugreen 80888 card reader USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Black, Metallic.

  • Compatible memory cards
    • Card reader USB 3.2 USB-C or USB-A, for CFexpress type B cards:CFexpress
    • 80888 card reader USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Black, Metallic:MicroSD (TransFlash), SD
  • Data transfer rate
    • Card reader USB 3.2 USB-C or USB-A, for CFexpress type B cards:10000 Mbit/s
    • 80888 card reader USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Black, Metallic:100 Mbit/s
  • Product colour
    • Card reader USB 3.2 USB-C or USB-A, for CFexpress type B cards:Aluminium, Black
    • 80888 card reader USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Black, Metallic:Black, Metallic
  • Width
    • Card reader USB 3.2 USB-C or USB-A, for CFexpress type B cards:57 mm
    • 80888 card reader USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Black, Metallic:34 mm
  • Depth
    • Card reader USB 3.2 USB-C or USB-A, for CFexpress type B cards:63 mm
    • 80888 card reader USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Black, Metallic:56.1 mm
  • Height
    • Card reader USB 3.2 USB-C or USB-A, for CFexpress type B cards:15 mm
    • 80888 card reader USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Black, Metallic:11 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of 66771, 80888
22 specifications
Performance3 differ
Compatible memory cardsDiffersCFexpressMicroSD (TransFlash), SD
InternalNoNo
Data transfer rateDiffers10000 Mbit/s100 Mbit/s
Product colourDiffersAluminium, BlackBlack, Metallic
Housing materialKnown for oneAluminiumUnknown — not stated by the source
Plug and PlayYesYes
Number of memory card slotsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2
Hot-swapKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Ports & interfacesidentical
InterfaceUSB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-CUSB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C
USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) ports quantityKnown for one1Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions3 differ
WidthDiffers57 mm34 mm
DepthDiffers63 mm56.1 mm
HeightDiffers15 mm11 mm
WeightKnown for one51 gUnknown — not stated by the source
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one100 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package depthKnown for one137 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one31 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package volumeKnown for one300 cm³Unknown — not stated by the source
Package weightKnown for one121 gUnknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
Cables includedKnown for oneUSB Type-C to USB Type-A, USB Type-C to USB Type-CUnknown — not stated by the source
ManualKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Other featuresidentical
Dimensions (WxDxH)Known for one57 x 63 x 15 mmUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More card reader comparisons

All card reader comparisons