Product comparison · 2 card readers

InLine Card reader USB 3.2 USB-C or USB-A, for CFexpress type B cards vs TooQ TQR-3003B card reader Black

Add a product
  • 13specifications compared
  • 11differ
  • 2identical
  • 13known for one product only

Key differences

The InLine Card reader USB 3.2 USB-C or USB-A, for CFexpress type B cards has 9,995 Mbit/s more data transfer rate than the TooQ TQR-3003B card reader Black (10000 Mbit/s vs 5 Mbit/s). The TooQ TQR-3003B card reader Black has 14 mm more width than the InLine Card reader USB 3.2 USB-C or USB-A, for CFexpress type B cards (71 mm vs 57 mm). The InLine Card reader USB 3.2 USB-C or USB-A, for CFexpress type B cards has 42 mm more depth than the TooQ TQR-3003B card reader Black (63 mm vs 21 mm). Compatible memory cards: CFexpress on the InLine Card reader USB 3.2 USB-C or USB-A, for CFexpress type B cards, MicroSD (TransFlash), SD on the TooQ TQR-3003B card reader Black. Product colour: Aluminium, Black on the InLine Card reader USB 3.2 USB-C or USB-A, for CFexpress type B cards, Black on the TooQ TQR-3003B card reader Black.

  • Compatible memory cards
    • Card reader USB 3.2 USB-C or USB-A, for CFexpress type B cards:CFexpress
    • TQR-3003B card reader Black:MicroSD (TransFlash), SD
  • Data transfer rate
    • Card reader USB 3.2 USB-C or USB-A, for CFexpress type B cards:10000 Mbit/s
    • TQR-3003B card reader Black:5 Mbit/s
  • Product colour
    • Card reader USB 3.2 USB-C or USB-A, for CFexpress type B cards:Aluminium, Black
    • TQR-3003B card reader Black:Black
  • Width
    • Card reader USB 3.2 USB-C or USB-A, for CFexpress type B cards:57 mm
    • TQR-3003B card reader Black:71 mm
  • Depth
    • Card reader USB 3.2 USB-C or USB-A, for CFexpress type B cards:63 mm
    • TQR-3003B card reader Black:21 mm
  • Height
    • Card reader USB 3.2 USB-C or USB-A, for CFexpress type B cards:15 mm
    • TQR-3003B card reader Black:14 mm
  • Weight
    • Card reader USB 3.2 USB-C or USB-A, for CFexpress type B cards:51 g
    • TQR-3003B card reader Black:11 g
  • Package width
    • Card reader USB 3.2 USB-C or USB-A, for CFexpress type B cards:100 mm
    • TQR-3003B card reader Black:135 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of 66771, TQR-3003B
26 specifications
Performance3 differ
Compatible memory cardsDiffersCFexpressMicroSD (TransFlash), SD
Data transfer rateDiffers10000 Mbit/s5 Mbit/s
Product colourDiffersAluminium, BlackBlack
Housing materialKnown for oneAluminiumUnknown — not stated by the source
Number of memory card slotsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2
Ports & interfacesidentical
InterfaceKnown for oneUSB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-CUnknown — not stated by the source
USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) ports quantityKnown for one1Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers57 mm71 mm
DepthDiffers63 mm21 mm
HeightDiffers15 mm14 mm
WeightDiffers51 g11 g
Packaging data4 differ
Package widthDiffers100 mm135 mm
Package depthDiffers137 mm180 mm
Package heightDiffers31 mm14 mm
Package volumeKnown for one300 cm³Unknown — not stated by the source
Package weightDiffers121 g19 g
Quantity per packKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1 pc(s)
Packaging contentidentical
Cables includedKnown for oneUSB Type-C to USB Type-A, USB Type-C to USB Type-CUnknown — not stated by the source
ManualKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Other featuresidentical
Dimensions (WxDxH)Known for one57 x 63 x 15 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Compliance certificatesKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceCE, RoHS
System requirementsidentical
Windows operating systems supportedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Mac operating systems supportedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Linux operating systems supportedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More card reader comparisons

All card reader comparisons