Product comparison · 2 card readers

ICY BOX IB-872-i3 card reader USB Internal Black vs Trust 24136 card reader USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Aluminium

Add a product
  • 10specifications compared
  • 9differ
  • 1identical
  • 15known for one product only

Key differences

The ICY BOX IB-872-i3 card reader USB Internal Black has 4,860 Mbit/s more data transfer rate than the Trust 24136 card reader USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Aluminium (5000 Mbit/s vs 140 Mbit/s). The ICY BOX IB-872-i3 card reader USB Internal Black has 90 mm more width than the Trust 24136 card reader USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Aluminium (124 mm vs 34 mm). The ICY BOX IB-872-i3 card reader USB Internal Black has 88 mm more depth than the Trust 24136 card reader USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Aluminium (102 mm vs 14 mm). Only the ICY BOX IB-872-i3 card reader USB Internal Black has internal. Product colour: Black on the ICY BOX IB-872-i3 card reader USB Internal Black, Aluminium on the Trust 24136 card reader USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Aluminium.

  • Internal
    • IB-872-i3 card reader USB Internal Black:Yes
    • 24136 card reader USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Aluminium:No
  • Data transfer rate
    • IB-872-i3 card reader USB Internal Black:5000 Mbit/s
    • 24136 card reader USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Aluminium:140 Mbit/s
  • Product colour
    • IB-872-i3 card reader USB Internal Black:Black
    • 24136 card reader USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Aluminium:Aluminium
  • Width
    • IB-872-i3 card reader USB Internal Black:124 mm
    • 24136 card reader USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Aluminium:34 mm
  • Depth
    • IB-872-i3 card reader USB Internal Black:102 mm
    • 24136 card reader USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Aluminium:14 mm
  • Height
    • IB-872-i3 card reader USB Internal Black:25 mm
    • 24136 card reader USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Aluminium:44 mm
  • Weight
    • IB-872-i3 card reader USB Internal Black:247 g
    • 24136 card reader USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Aluminium:20 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of IB-872-i3, 24136
25 specifications
Performance4 differ
Compatible memory cardsDiffersCF, MS Micro (M2), MS PRO, MS PRO Duo, MS PRO Duo Mark 2, MS Pro-HG, MS Pro-HG Duo, MS Pro-HG Duo HX, Memory Stick (MS), MicroSD (TransFlash), SDMicroSD (TransFlash), SD, SDHC, SDXC
InternalDiffersYesNo
Number of memory card slotsKnown for one4Unknown — not stated by the source
Supported drive baysKnown for one3.5"Unknown — not stated by the source
Data transfer rateDiffers5000 Mbit/s140 Mbit/s
Product colourDiffersBlackAluminium
Housing materialKnown for oneMetal, PlasticUnknown — not stated by the source
Plug and PlayKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
LED indicatorsKnown for oneAccess, PowerUnknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfaces1 differ
InterfaceDiffersUSBUSB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C
USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) ports quantityKnown for one1Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers124 mm34 mm
DepthDiffers102 mm14 mm
HeightDiffers25 mm44 mm
WeightDiffers247 g20 g
Cable lengthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0.08 m
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one32 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package depthKnown for one144 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one230 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package weightKnown for one327 gUnknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
ManualKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
System requirementsidentical
Compatible operating systemsKnown for oneWindowsUnknown — not stated by the source
Technical detailsidentical
Country of originKnown for oneChinaUnknown — not stated by the source
Logistics dataidentical
Harmonized System (HS) codeKnown for one84719000Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More card reader comparisons

All card reader comparisons