Product comparison · 2 card readers

Hama 123900 card reader USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Black, Silver vs Hama 123902 card reader USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Black, Red

Add a product
  • 19specifications compared
  • 4differ
  • 15identical
  • 0known for one product only

Key differences

  • Product colour
    • 123900 card reader USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Black, Silver:Black, Silver
    • 123902 card reader USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Black, Red:Black, Red
  • Package width
    • 123900 card reader USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Black, Silver:182 mm
    • 123902 card reader USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Black, Red:180 mm
  • Package depth
    • 123900 card reader USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Black, Silver:142 mm
    • 123902 card reader USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Black, Red:140 mm
  • Package weight
    • 123900 card reader USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Black, Silver:68 g
    • 123902 card reader USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Black, Red:69 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of 123900, 123902
19 specifications
Performance1 differ
Compatible memory cardsMicroSD (TransFlash), MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC, MMC, SD, SDHC, SDXCMicroSD (TransFlash), MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC, MMC, SD, SDHC, SDXC
InternalNoNo
Product colourDiffersBlack, SilverBlack, Red
Hot-swapYesYes
Plug and PlayYesYes
LED indicatorsYesYes
Ports & interfacesidentical
InterfaceUSB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1)USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1)
USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) ports quantity00
Weight & dimensionsidentical
Width68.1 mm68.1 mm
Depth22.7 mm22.7 mm
Height12 mm12 mm
Weight19 g19 g
Packaging data3 differ
Package widthDiffers182 mm180 mm
Package depthDiffers142 mm140 mm
Package height15 mm15 mm
Package weightDiffers68 g69 g
System requirementsidentical
Windows operating systems supportedYesYes
Mac operating systems supportedYesYes
Technical detailsidentical
USB poweredYesYes

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More card reader comparisons

All card reader comparisons