Product comparison · 2 card readers

Hama USB Card Reader, USB-C, USB 3.0, SD/microSD, Aluminium vs InLine Card reader USB 3.1 USB-A, for SD/SDHC/SDXC, microSD, UHS-II compatible

Add a product
  • 15specifications compared
  • 13differ
  • 2identical
  • 5known for one product only

Key differences

The Hama USB Card Reader, USB-C, USB 3.0, SD/microSD, Aluminium has 4,900 Mbit/s more data transfer rate than the InLine Card reader USB 3.1 USB-A, for SD/SDHC/SDXC, microSD, UHS-II compatible (5000 Mbit/s vs 100 Mbit/s). The InLine Card reader USB 3.1 USB-A, for SD/SDHC/SDXC, microSD, UHS-II compatible has 16.8 mm more width than the Hama USB Card Reader, USB-C, USB 3.0, SD/microSD, Aluminium (33 mm vs 16.2 mm). The InLine Card reader USB 3.1 USB-A, for SD/SDHC/SDXC, microSD, UHS-II compatible has 227.1 mm more depth than the Hama USB Card Reader, USB-C, USB 3.0, SD/microSD, Aluminium (235 mm vs 7.9 mm). Product colour: Silver on the Hama USB Card Reader, USB-C, USB 3.0, SD/microSD, Aluminium, Black on the InLine Card reader USB 3.1 USB-A, for SD/SDHC/SDXC, microSD, UHS-II compatible. Interface: USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C on the Hama USB Card Reader, USB-C, USB 3.0, SD/microSD, Aluminium, USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A on the InLine Card reader USB 3.1 USB-A, for SD/SDHC/SDXC, microSD, UHS-II compatible.

  • Data transfer rate
    • USB Card Reader, USB-C, USB 3.0, SD/microSD, Aluminium:5000 Mbit/s
    • Card reader USB 3.1 USB-A, for SD/SDHC/SDXC, microSD, UHS-II compatible:100 Mbit/s
  • Product colour
    • USB Card Reader, USB-C, USB 3.0, SD/microSD, Aluminium:Silver
    • Card reader USB 3.1 USB-A, for SD/SDHC/SDXC, microSD, UHS-II compatible:Black
  • Width
    • USB Card Reader, USB-C, USB 3.0, SD/microSD, Aluminium:16.2 mm
    • Card reader USB 3.1 USB-A, for SD/SDHC/SDXC, microSD, UHS-II compatible:33 mm
  • Depth
    • USB Card Reader, USB-C, USB 3.0, SD/microSD, Aluminium:7.9 mm
    • Card reader USB 3.1 USB-A, for SD/SDHC/SDXC, microSD, UHS-II compatible:235 mm
  • Height
    • USB Card Reader, USB-C, USB 3.0, SD/microSD, Aluminium:47.2 mm
    • Card reader USB 3.1 USB-A, for SD/SDHC/SDXC, microSD, UHS-II compatible:11 mm
  • Weight
    • USB Card Reader, USB-C, USB 3.0, SD/microSD, Aluminium:11 g
    • Card reader USB 3.1 USB-A, for SD/SDHC/SDXC, microSD, UHS-II compatible:23 g
  • Package width
    • USB Card Reader, USB-C, USB 3.0, SD/microSD, Aluminium:230 mm
    • Card reader USB 3.1 USB-A, for SD/SDHC/SDXC, microSD, UHS-II compatible:106 mm
  • Package depth
    • USB Card Reader, USB-C, USB 3.0, SD/microSD, Aluminium:90 mm
    • Card reader USB 3.1 USB-A, for SD/SDHC/SDXC, microSD, UHS-II compatible:195 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of 00200131, 66772A
20 specifications
Performance3 differ
Compatible memory cardsDiffersMicroSD (TransFlash), MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC, SD, SDHC, SDXCMMC Mobile, MicroSD (TransFlash), MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC, RS-MMC, SD, SDHC, SDXC
InternalNoNo
Data transfer rateDiffers5000 Mbit/s100 Mbit/s
Product colourDiffersSilverBlack
Housing materialKnown for oneAluminiumUnknown — not stated by the source
Plug and PlayKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfaces1 differ
InterfaceDiffersUSB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-CUSB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers16.2 mm33 mm
DepthDiffers7.9 mm235 mm
HeightDiffers47.2 mm11 mm
Cable lengthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0.165 m
WeightDiffers11 g23 g
Packaging data4 differ
Quantity per pack1 pc(s)1 pc(s)
Package widthDiffers230 mm106 mm
Package depthDiffers90 mm195 mm
Package heightDiffers20 mm15 mm
Package weightDiffers40 g50 g
Package typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceBlister
System requirements1 differ
Compatible operating systemsDiffersWindows 10/8/7 Mac OS 10.8Windows 7/8/8.1/10, Mac OS 10.4
Other featuresidentical
Dimensions (WxDxH)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source33 x 235 x 11 mm

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More card reader comparisons

All card reader comparisons