Product comparison · 2 card readers

Hama USB 3.0 Card Reader, SD/micro SD, Anthracite vs ICY BOX 2-in-1 Card Reader via USB Type-A & USB Type-C Interface

Add a product
  • 13specifications compared
  • 8differ
  • 5identical
  • 16known for one product only

Key differences

The Hama USB 3.0 Card Reader, SD/micro SD, Anthracite has 37 mm more width than the ICY BOX 2-in-1 Card Reader via USB Type-A & USB Type-C Interface (72 mm vs 35 mm). The ICY BOX 2-in-1 Card Reader via USB Type-A & USB Type-C Interface has 52 mm more depth than the Hama USB 3.0 Card Reader, SD/micro SD, Anthracite (62 mm vs 10 mm). The Hama USB 3.0 Card Reader, SD/micro SD, Anthracite has 17.5 mm more height than the ICY BOX 2-in-1 Card Reader via USB Type-A & USB Type-C Interface (28.5 mm vs 11 mm). Product colour: Anthracite on the Hama USB 3.0 Card Reader, SD/micro SD, Anthracite, Black on the ICY BOX 2-in-1 Card Reader via USB Type-A & USB Type-C Interface. LED indicators: Status on the Hama USB 3.0 Card Reader, SD/micro SD, Anthracite, Yes on the ICY BOX 2-in-1 Card Reader via USB Type-A & USB Type-C Interface.

  • Product colour
    • USB 3.0 Card Reader, SD/micro SD, Anthracite:Anthracite
    • 2-in-1 Card Reader via USB Type-A & USB Type-C Interface:Black
  • LED indicators
    • USB 3.0 Card Reader, SD/micro SD, Anthracite:Status
    • 2-in-1 Card Reader via USB Type-A & USB Type-C Interface:Yes
  • Width
    • USB 3.0 Card Reader, SD/micro SD, Anthracite:72 mm
    • 2-in-1 Card Reader via USB Type-A & USB Type-C Interface:35 mm
  • Depth
    • USB 3.0 Card Reader, SD/micro SD, Anthracite:10 mm
    • 2-in-1 Card Reader via USB Type-A & USB Type-C Interface:62 mm
  • Height
    • USB 3.0 Card Reader, SD/micro SD, Anthracite:28.5 mm
    • 2-in-1 Card Reader via USB Type-A & USB Type-C Interface:11 mm
  • Weight
    • USB 3.0 Card Reader, SD/micro SD, Anthracite:15 g
    • 2-in-1 Card Reader via USB Type-A & USB Type-C Interface:23 g
  • Package weight
    • USB 3.0 Card Reader, SD/micro SD, Anthracite:30 g
    • 2-in-1 Card Reader via USB Type-A & USB Type-C Interface:53 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of 00124194, IB-CR204-CU3
29 specifications
Performance2 differ
Number of memory card slotsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2
Product colourDiffersAnthraciteBlack
Housing materialKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceAcrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS)
Plug and PlayKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
LED indicatorsDiffersStatusYes
Maximum memory card sizeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2 TB
Ports & interfaces1 differ
InterfaceDiffersUSBUSB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A/Type-C
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers72 mm35 mm
DepthDiffers10 mm62 mm
HeightDiffers28.5 mm11 mm
WeightDiffers15 g23 g
Packaging data1 differ
Package weightDiffers30 g53 g
Package widthKnown for one100 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package depthKnown for one80 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one20 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
Interface adapters includedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceUSB Type-C - USB Type A
System requirementsidentical
Windows operating systems supportedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Mac operating systems supportedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Linux operating systems supportedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Compatible operating systemsKnown for oneWindows 10/8/7/XP MAC OS 9.x +Unknown — not stated by the source
Data transmissionidentical
Write speedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source170 MB/s
Read speedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source170 MB/s
Technical detailsidentical
ChipsetKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceGL3231
Country of originKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceChina

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More card reader comparisons

All card reader comparisons