Product comparison · 2 card readers

CoolBox COO-CRE-4AC card reader USB Black vs Hama 00200148 card reader USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A/Type-C Black

Add a product
  • 8specifications compared
  • 5differ
  • 3identical
  • 9known for one product only

Key differences

The CoolBox COO-CRE-4AC card reader USB Black has 23.2 mm more width than the Hama 00200148 card reader USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A/Type-C Black (37.2 mm vs 14 mm). The CoolBox COO-CRE-4AC card reader USB Black has 8.6 mm more height than the Hama 00200148 card reader USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A/Type-C Black (68.6 mm vs 60 mm). The Hama 00200148 card reader USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A/Type-C Black has 14 g more weight than the CoolBox COO-CRE-4AC card reader USB Black (42 g vs 28 g). Interface: USB on the CoolBox COO-CRE-4AC card reader USB Black, USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A/Type-C on the Hama 00200148 card reader USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A/Type-C Black.

  • Width
    • COO-CRE-4AC card reader USB Black:37.2 mm
    • 00200148 card reader USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A/Type-C Black:14 mm
  • Height
    • COO-CRE-4AC card reader USB Black:68.6 mm
    • 00200148 card reader USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A/Type-C Black:60 mm
  • Weight
    • COO-CRE-4AC card reader USB Black:28 g
    • 00200148 card reader USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A/Type-C Black:42 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of COO-CRE-4AC, 00200148
17 specifications
Performance1 differ
Compatible memory cardsDiffersMMC, MS Micro (M2), MS PRO, MS PRO Duo, Memory Stick (MS), MicroSD (TransFlash), MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC, RS-MMC, SD, SDHC, SDXCCF, CF Type II, MS Duo, MS PRO Duo, Memory Stick (MS), MicroDrive, MMC, SD, SDHC, SDXC, MicroSDHC, MiniSD, xD
Data transfer rateKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source5000 Mbit/s
Plug and PlayKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Housing materialKnown for oneAcrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS)Unknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfaces1 differ
InterfaceDiffersUSBUSB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A/Type-C
Weight & dimensions3 differ
WidthDiffers37.2 mm14 mm
HeightDiffers68.6 mm60 mm
WeightDiffers28 g42 g
DepthKnown for one16 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Packaging dataidentical
Quantity per packKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1 pc(s)
Package widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source230 mm
Package depthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source92 mm
Package heightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source28 mm
Package weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source86 g

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More card reader comparisons

All card reader comparisons