Product comparison · 2 card readers

Conceptronic BIAN SD Card Reader USB 3.0 vs TP-Link UA440C(UN) card reader USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Grey

Add a product
  • 7specifications compared
  • 6differ
  • 1identical
  • 22known for one product only

Key differences

The TP-Link UA440C(UN) card reader USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Grey has 522.5 mm more width than the Conceptronic BIAN SD Card Reader USB 3.0 (544 mm vs 21.5 mm). The TP-Link UA440C(UN) card reader USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Grey has 270.8 mm more depth than the Conceptronic BIAN SD Card Reader USB 3.0 (342 mm vs 71.2 mm). The TP-Link UA440C(UN) card reader USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Grey has 105.4 mm more height than the Conceptronic BIAN SD Card Reader USB 3.0 (115 mm vs 9.6 mm). Product colour: Black on the Conceptronic BIAN SD Card Reader USB 3.0, Grey on the TP-Link UA440C(UN) card reader USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Grey. Interface: USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A on the Conceptronic BIAN SD Card Reader USB 3.0, USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C on the TP-Link UA440C(UN) card reader USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Grey.

  • Product colour
    • BIAN SD Card Reader USB 3.0:Black
    • UA440C(UN) card reader USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Grey:Grey
  • Width
    • BIAN SD Card Reader USB 3.0:21.5 mm
    • UA440C(UN) card reader USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Grey:544 mm
  • Depth
    • BIAN SD Card Reader USB 3.0:71.2 mm
    • UA440C(UN) card reader USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Grey:342 mm
  • Height
    • BIAN SD Card Reader USB 3.0:9.6 mm
    • UA440C(UN) card reader USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Grey:115 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of BIAN02B, UA440C(UN)
29 specifications
Performance2 differ
Compatible memory cardsDiffersMicroSD (TransFlash), MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC, SD, SDHC, SDXCMicroSD (TransFlash), SD
InternalNoNo
Number of memory card slotsKnown for one2Unknown — not stated by the source
Product colourDiffersBlackGrey
Plug and PlayKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
LED indicatorsKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Housing materialKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceAluminium
CertificationKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceCE, FCC, RoHS, BSMI
Ports & interfaces1 differ
InterfaceDiffersUSB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-AUSB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C
Weight & dimensions3 differ
WidthDiffers21.5 mm544 mm
DepthDiffers71.2 mm342 mm
HeightDiffers9.6 mm115 mm
WeightKnown for one12 gUnknown — not stated by the source
Packaging dataidentical
Quantity per packKnown for one1 pc(s)Unknown — not stated by the source
Package widthKnown for one75 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package depthKnown for one20 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one160 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package weightKnown for one24 gUnknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
ManualKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Technical detailsidentical
Country of originKnown for oneChinaUnknown — not stated by the source
Logistics dataidentical
Harmonized System (HS) codeKnown for one84719000Unknown — not stated by the source
Products per master (outer) caseKnown for one50 pc(s)Unknown — not stated by the source
Master (outer) case widthKnown for one230 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Master (outer) case lengthKnown for one180 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Master (outer) case heightKnown for one320 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Master (outer) case gross weightKnown for one1.5 kgUnknown — not stated by the source
System requirementsidentical
Windows operating systems supportedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Mac operating systems supportedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Linux operating systems supportedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More card reader comparisons

All card reader comparisons