Product comparison · 2 card readers

Conceptronic BIAN SD Card Reader USB 3.0 vs InLine Card reader USB 3.1 USB-C, for SD/SDHC/SDXC, microSD, UHS-II compatible

Add a product
  • 13specifications compared
  • 10differ
  • 3identical
  • 14known for one product only

Key differences

The InLine Card reader USB 3.1 USB-C, for SD/SDHC/SDXC, microSD, UHS-II compatible has 11.5 mm more width than the Conceptronic BIAN SD Card Reader USB 3.0 (33 mm vs 21.5 mm). The InLine Card reader USB 3.1 USB-C, for SD/SDHC/SDXC, microSD, UHS-II compatible has 158.8 mm more depth than the Conceptronic BIAN SD Card Reader USB 3.0 (230 mm vs 71.2 mm). The InLine Card reader USB 3.1 USB-C, for SD/SDHC/SDXC, microSD, UHS-II compatible has 1.4 mm more height than the Conceptronic BIAN SD Card Reader USB 3.0 (11 mm vs 9.6 mm). Interface: USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A on the Conceptronic BIAN SD Card Reader USB 3.0, USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C on the InLine Card reader USB 3.1 USB-C, for SD/SDHC/SDXC, microSD, UHS-II compatible.

  • Width
    • BIAN SD Card Reader USB 3.0:21.5 mm
    • Card reader USB 3.1 USB-C, for SD/SDHC/SDXC, microSD, UHS-II compatible:33 mm
  • Depth
    • BIAN SD Card Reader USB 3.0:71.2 mm
    • Card reader USB 3.1 USB-C, for SD/SDHC/SDXC, microSD, UHS-II compatible:230 mm
  • Height
    • BIAN SD Card Reader USB 3.0:9.6 mm
    • Card reader USB 3.1 USB-C, for SD/SDHC/SDXC, microSD, UHS-II compatible:11 mm
  • Weight
    • BIAN SD Card Reader USB 3.0:12 g
    • Card reader USB 3.1 USB-C, for SD/SDHC/SDXC, microSD, UHS-II compatible:21 g
  • Package width
    • BIAN SD Card Reader USB 3.0:75 mm
    • Card reader USB 3.1 USB-C, for SD/SDHC/SDXC, microSD, UHS-II compatible:105 mm
  • Package depth
    • BIAN SD Card Reader USB 3.0:20 mm
    • Card reader USB 3.1 USB-C, for SD/SDHC/SDXC, microSD, UHS-II compatible:195 mm
  • Package height
    • BIAN SD Card Reader USB 3.0:160 mm
    • Card reader USB 3.1 USB-C, for SD/SDHC/SDXC, microSD, UHS-II compatible:16 mm
  • Package weight
    • BIAN SD Card Reader USB 3.0:24 g
    • Card reader USB 3.1 USB-C, for SD/SDHC/SDXC, microSD, UHS-II compatible:47 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of BIAN02B, 66772C
27 specifications
Performance1 differ
Compatible memory cardsDiffersMicroSD (TransFlash), MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC, SD, SDHC, SDXCHC MMC+, MMC, MMC+, MicroSD (TransFlash), MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC, SD, SDHC, SDXC
Number of memory card slotsKnown for one2Unknown — not stated by the source
LED indicatorsKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Data transfer rateKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source5000 Mbit/s
Ports & interfaces1 differ
InterfaceDiffersUSB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-AUSB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers21.5 mm33 mm
DepthDiffers71.2 mm230 mm
HeightDiffers9.6 mm11 mm
WeightDiffers12 g21 g
Packaging data4 differ
Quantity per packKnown for one1 pc(s)Unknown — not stated by the source
Package widthDiffers75 mm105 mm
Package depthDiffers20 mm195 mm
Package heightDiffers160 mm16 mm
Package weightDiffers24 g47 g
Package typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceBlister
Packaging contentidentical
ManualKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Technical detailsidentical
Country of originKnown for oneChinaUnknown — not stated by the source
Logistics dataidentical
Harmonized System (HS) codeKnown for one84719000Unknown — not stated by the source
Products per master (outer) caseKnown for one50 pc(s)Unknown — not stated by the source
Master (outer) case widthKnown for one230 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Master (outer) case lengthKnown for one180 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Master (outer) case heightKnown for one320 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Master (outer) case gross weightKnown for one1.5 kgUnknown — not stated by the source
Other featuresidentical
Dimensions (WxDxH)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source33 x 230 x 11 mm

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More card reader comparisons

All card reader comparisons