Product comparison · 2 card readers

Conceptronic BIAN SD Card Reader USB 3.0 vs ICY BOX IB-865a card reader USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Internal Black

Add a product
  • 18specifications compared
  • 13differ
  • 5identical
  • 11known for one product only

Key differences

The ICY BOX IB-865a card reader USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Internal Black has 2 more memory card slots than the Conceptronic BIAN SD Card Reader USB 3.0 (4 vs 2). The ICY BOX IB-865a card reader USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Internal Black has 98.5 mm more width than the Conceptronic BIAN SD Card Reader USB 3.0 (120 mm vs 21.5 mm). The ICY BOX IB-865a card reader USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Internal Black has 38.8 mm more depth than the Conceptronic BIAN SD Card Reader USB 3.0 (110 mm vs 71.2 mm). Only the ICY BOX IB-865a card reader USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Internal Black has internal. LED indicators: Yes on the Conceptronic BIAN SD Card Reader USB 3.0, Access, Power on the ICY BOX IB-865a card reader USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Internal Black.

  • Internal
    • BIAN SD Card Reader USB 3.0:No
    • IB-865a card reader USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Internal Black:Yes
  • Number of memory card slots
    • BIAN SD Card Reader USB 3.0:2
    • IB-865a card reader USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Internal Black:4
  • LED indicators
    • BIAN SD Card Reader USB 3.0:Yes
    • IB-865a card reader USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Internal Black:Access, Power
  • Width
    • BIAN SD Card Reader USB 3.0:21.5 mm
    • IB-865a card reader USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Internal Black:120 mm
  • Depth
    • BIAN SD Card Reader USB 3.0:71.2 mm
    • IB-865a card reader USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Internal Black:110 mm
  • Height
    • BIAN SD Card Reader USB 3.0:9.6 mm
    • IB-865a card reader USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Internal Black:25 mm
  • Weight
    • BIAN SD Card Reader USB 3.0:12 g
    • IB-865a card reader USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Internal Black:268 g
  • Package width
    • BIAN SD Card Reader USB 3.0:75 mm
    • IB-865a card reader USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Internal Black:30 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of BIAN02B, IB-865a
29 specifications
Performance4 differ
Compatible memory cardsDiffersMicroSD (TransFlash), MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC, SD, SDHC, SDXCCF, MS PRO, MicroSD (TransFlash), SD
InternalDiffersNoYes
Number of memory card slotsDiffers24
Product colourBlackBlack
Plug and PlayKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
LED indicatorsDiffersYesAccess, Power
Supported drive baysKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source3.5"
Data transfer rateKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source10000 Mbit/s
Housing materialKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceMetal, Plastic
Ports & interfaces1 differ
InterfaceDiffersUSB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-AUSB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1)
USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers21.5 mm120 mm
DepthDiffers71.2 mm110 mm
HeightDiffers9.6 mm25 mm
WeightDiffers12 g268 g
Packaging data4 differ
Quantity per pack1 pc(s)1 pc(s)
Package widthDiffers75 mm30 mm
Package depthDiffers20 mm143 mm
Package heightDiffers160 mm200 mm
Package weightDiffers24 g343 g
Packaging contentidentical
ManualYesYes
Technical detailsidentical
Country of originChinaChina
Logistics dataidentical
Harmonized System (HS) code8471900084719000
Products per master (outer) caseKnown for one50 pc(s)Unknown — not stated by the source
Master (outer) case widthKnown for one230 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Master (outer) case lengthKnown for one180 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Master (outer) case heightKnown for one320 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Master (outer) case gross weightKnown for one1.5 kgUnknown — not stated by the source
System requirementsidentical
Compatible operating systemsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceWindows

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More card reader comparisons

All card reader comparisons