Product comparison · 2 card readers

Chieftec CRD-908H card reader USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Internal Black vs InLine 66772F card reader USB Grey

Add a product
  • 10specifications compared
  • 10differ
  • 0identical
  • 16known for one product only

Key differences

The InLine 66772F card reader USB Grey has 1 more USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) ports quantity than the Chieftec CRD-908H card reader USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Internal Black (3 vs 2). The Chieftec CRD-908H card reader USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Internal Black has 45 mm more width than the InLine 66772F card reader USB Grey (102 mm vs 57 mm). The Chieftec CRD-908H card reader USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Internal Black has 40.2 mm more depth than the InLine 66772F card reader USB Grey (135.2 mm vs 95 mm). Only the Chieftec CRD-908H card reader USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Internal Black has internal. Product colour: Black on the Chieftec CRD-908H card reader USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Internal Black, Grey on the InLine 66772F card reader USB Grey.

  • Internal
    • CRD-908H card reader USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Internal Black:Yes
    • 66772F card reader USB Grey:No
  • Product colour
    • CRD-908H card reader USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Internal Black:Black
    • 66772F card reader USB Grey:Grey
  • Interface
    • CRD-908H card reader USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Internal Black:USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1)
    • 66772F card reader USB Grey:USB
  • USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) ports quantity
    • CRD-908H card reader USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Internal Black:2
    • 66772F card reader USB Grey:3
  • Width
    • CRD-908H card reader USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Internal Black:102 mm
    • 66772F card reader USB Grey:57 mm
  • Depth
    • CRD-908H card reader USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Internal Black:135.2 mm
    • 66772F card reader USB Grey:95 mm
  • Height
    • CRD-908H card reader USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Internal Black:25.3 mm
    • 66772F card reader USB Grey:15 mm
  • Weight
    • CRD-908H card reader USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Internal Black:253 g
    • 66772F card reader USB Grey:73 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of CRD-908H, 66772F
26 specifications
Performance3 differ
Compatible memory cardsDiffersMicroSD (TransFlash), SDCF, Memory Stick (MS), MicroSD (TransFlash), SD, xD
InternalDiffersYesNo
Product colourDiffersBlackGrey
Plug and PlayKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Number of memory card slotsKnown for one2Unknown — not stated by the source
Supported drive baysKnown for one3.5"Unknown — not stated by the source
Data transfer rateKnown for one5000 Mbit/sUnknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfaces2 differ
InterfaceDiffersUSB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1)USB
USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) ports quantityDiffers23
USB 2.0 ports quantityKnown for one2Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers102 mm57 mm
DepthDiffers135.2 mm95 mm
HeightDiffers25.3 mm15 mm
Cable lengthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0.3 m
WeightDiffers253 g73 g
Packaging data1 differ
Package widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source103 mm
Package depthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source161 mm
Package heightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source25 mm
Package volumeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source200 cm³
Package weightDiffers294 g96 g
Quantity per packKnown for one1 pc(s)Unknown — not stated by the source
System requirementsidentical
Windows operating systems supportedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Mac operating systems supportedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceMacOS
Linux operating systems supportedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Mobile operating systems supportedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceAndroid
Other featuresidentical
Dimensions (WxDxH)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source57 x 95 x 15 mm

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More card reader comparisons

All card reader comparisons