All categories
Phones & WearablesView all 31

Departments

Phones & WearablesComputers & TabletsComponents & StorageNetworkingPrinting & OfficePower & ChargingTV, Audio & VideoGaming, Toys & RobotsKitchen AppliancesHome AppliancesPersonal Care & HealthSmart Home & SecurityCar & MobilityTools & GardenCameras & Photo

Shopping country

Browse

All categoriesCompare products

Product comparison · 2 card readers

ACT AC7054 card reader USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Black, Silver vs Techly IUSB-CARD-AC575 card reader USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A/Type-C Black

Add a product
  • 13specifications compared
  • 10differ
  • 3identical
  • 11known for one product only

Key differences

The Techly IUSB-CARD-AC575 card reader USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A/Type-C Black has 5 more memory card slots than the ACT AC7054 card reader USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Black, Silver (7 vs 2). The Techly IUSB-CARD-AC575 card reader USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A/Type-C Black has 70 mm more width than the ACT AC7054 card reader USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Black, Silver (110 mm vs 40 mm). The Techly IUSB-CARD-AC575 card reader USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A/Type-C Black has 30 mm more depth than the ACT AC7054 card reader USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Black, Silver (46.5 mm vs 16.5 mm). Product colour: Black, Silver on the ACT AC7054 card reader USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Black, Silver, Black on the Techly IUSB-CARD-AC575 card reader USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A/Type-C Black. Interface: USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C on the ACT AC7054 card reader USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Black, Silver, USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A/Type-C on the Techly IUSB-CARD-AC575 card reader USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A/Type-C Black.

  • Number of memory card slots
    • 2
    • 7
  • Product colour
    • Black, Silver
    • Black
  • Width
    • 40 mm
    • 110 mm
  • Depth
    • 16.5 mm
    • 46.5 mm
  • Height
    • 11 mm
    • 12 mm
  • Cable length
    • 0.12 m
    • 0.4 m
  • Weight
    • 26 g
    • 57.5 g
  • Package type
    • Box
    • Hanging box

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only
24 specifications
A

ACT

AC7054 card reader USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Black, Silver

Model AC7054

View product
B

Techly

IUSB-CARD-AC575 card reader USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A/Type-C Black

Model IUSB-CARD-AC575

View product
Performance3 differ
Compatible memory cardsDiffersMicroSD (TransFlash), MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC, SD, SDHC, SDXCCF, CF Type II, MMC, MMC Mobile, MS PRO Duo, Memory Stick (MS), MicroSD (TransFlash), MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC, RS-MMC, SD, SDHC, SDXC, xD
Number of memory card slotsDiffers27
Product colourDiffersBlack, SilverBlack
LED indicatorsKnown for oneStatus
Maximum memory card sizeKnown for one2 TB
Housing materialKnown for oneAluminium
USB On-The-Go supportKnown for oneYes
Ports & interfaces1 differ
InterfaceDiffersUSB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-CUSB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A/Type-C
Poweridentical
Power source typeKnown for oneUSB
Weight & dimensions5 differ
WidthDiffers40 mm110 mm
DepthDiffers16.5 mm46.5 mm
HeightDiffers11 mm12 mm
Cable lengthDiffers0.12 m0.4 m
WeightDiffers26 g57.5 g
Packaging data1 differ
Package typeDiffersBoxHanging box
Quantity per packKnown for one1 pc(s)
Packaging contentidentical
ManualKnown for oneYes
System requirementsidentical
Windows operating systems supportedKnown for oneWindows 10, Windows 11, Windows 2000, Windows 7, Windows 8, Windows Vista, Windows XP
Mac operating systems supportedKnown for oneMac OS X 10.4 Tiger, Mac OS X 10.5 Leopard, Mac OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard, Mac OS X 10.7 Lion, Mac OS X 10.8 Mountain Lion, Mac OS X 10.9 Mavericks, Mac OS X 11.0 Big Sur, Mac OS X 12.0 Monterey, Mac OS X 13.0 Ventura, Mac OS X 14.0 Sonoma
Mobile operating systems supportedKnown for oneAndroid
Logistics dataidentical
Products per master (outer) caseKnown for one60 pc(s)

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More card reader comparisons

All card reader comparisons