Product comparison · 2 car speakers

JVC CS-J410X car speaker Round 2-way vs Kenwood KFC-S6976EX car speaker Oval 3-way

9specifications compared
8differ
1identical
21known for one product only

Key differences

The Kenwood KFC-S6976EX car speaker Oval 3-way has 1 -way more speaker type than the JVC CS-J410X car speaker Round 2-way (3-way vs 2-way). The Kenwood KFC-S6976EX car speaker Oval 3-way has 290 W more peak power than the JVC CS-J410X car speaker Round 2-way (500 W vs 210 W). The Kenwood KFC-S6976EX car speaker Oval 3-way has 266 g more magnet weight than the JVC CS-J410X car speaker Round 2-way (340 g vs 74 g). Frequency range: 45 - 20000 Hz on the JVC CS-J410X car speaker Round 2-way, 44 - 18000 Hz on the Kenwood KFC-S6976EX car speaker Oval 3-way. Shape: Round on the JVC CS-J410X car speaker Round 2-way, Oval on the Kenwood KFC-S6976EX car speaker Oval 3-way.

Speaker type
- CS-J410X car speaker Round 2-way:2-way
- KFC-S6976EX car speaker Oval 3-way:3-way
Peak power
- CS-J410X car speaker Round 2-way:210 W
- KFC-S6976EX car speaker Oval 3-way:500 W
Frequency range
- CS-J410X car speaker Round 2-way:45 - 20000 Hz
- KFC-S6976EX car speaker Oval 3-way:44 - 18000 Hz
Magnet weight
- CS-J410X car speaker Round 2-way:74 g
- KFC-S6976EX car speaker Oval 3-way:340 g
Shape
- CS-J410X car speaker Round 2-way:Round
- KFC-S6976EX car speaker Oval 3-way:Oval
Weight
- CS-J410X car speaker Round 2-way:220 g
- KFC-S6976EX car speaker Oval 3-way:1.1 kg
Mounting depth
- CS-J410X car speaker Round 2-way:4.31 cm
- KFC-S6976EX car speaker Oval 3-way:7.93 cm
Quantity per pack
- CS-J410X car speaker Round 2-way:2 pc(s)
- KFC-S6976EX car speaker Oval 3-way:1 pc(s)

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of CS-J410X, KFC-S6976EX
30 specifications	A JVC CS-J410X car speaker Round 2-way Model CS-J410X View product	B Kenwood KFC-S6976EX car speaker Oval 3-way Model KFC-S6976EX View product
Audio4 differ
Speaker typeDiffers	2-way	3-way
SensitivityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	87 dB
Peak powerDiffers	210 W	500 W
Impedance	4 Ω	4 Ω
Frequency rangeDiffers	45 - 20000 Hz	44 - 18000 Hz
TweeterKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Tweeter magnet typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Ceramic
Magnet weightDiffers	74 g	340 g
Midrange speaker magnet typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Ferrite
Driver diaphragm materialKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Polypropylene
Rated powerKnown for one	21 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Technical details1 differ
ShapeDiffers	Round	Oval
RMS rated powerKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	80 W
Product colourKnown for one	Black	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions2 differ
WidthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	268 mm
DepthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	90.8 mm
HeightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	193 mm
WeightDiffers	220 g	1.1 kg
Woofer size (W x H) (imperial)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	152.4 x 228.6 mm (6 x 9")
Woofer size (W x H)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	153 x 229 mm
Tweeter diameterKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1.2 cm
Mid-range driver diameterKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5 cm
Mounting depthDiffers	4.31 cm	7.93 cm
Mounting heightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	15.4 cm
Mounting hole diameterKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	22.2 cm
Woofer diameterKnown for one	1 cm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Amplifieridentical
Amplifier includedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Packaging content1 differ
Quantity per packDiffers	2 pc(s)	1 pc(s)
Subwooferidentical
Sound pressure level (max)Known for one	90 dB	Unknown — not stated by the source
Woofer magnet typeKnown for one	Ferrite	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More car speakers comparisons

All car speakers comparisons