Product comparison · 2 camera flashes

Ricoh GF-1 Slave flash Black vs Samsung ED-SEF42A camera flash Black

Add a product
  • 4specifications compared
  • 1differ
  • 3identical
  • 18known for one product only

Key differences

  • Weight
    • GF-1 Slave flash Black:240 g
    • ED-SEF42A camera flash Black:220 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of GF-1, ED-SEF42A
22 specifications
Featuresidentical
TypeKnown for oneSlave flashUnknown — not stated by the source
Product colourBlackBlack
Approximate recycling timeKnown for one4.7 sUnknown — not stated by the source
Colour temperatureKnown for one5600 KUnknown — not stated by the source
Approx. number of flashesKnown for one200Unknown — not stated by the source
Guide number (ISO 100, set at 35mm zoom)Known for one0.018 mUnknown — not stated by the source
Flash coverageKnown for one24 - 105 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Camera brands compatibilityKnown for oneRicohUnknown — not stated by the source
Flash guide numberKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source26 m
CompatibilityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceSamsung NX10
Poweridentical
Number of batteries supported44
Battery typeAAAA
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WidthKnown for one65 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
DepthKnown for one80 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
HeightKnown for one95 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
WeightDiffers240 g220 g
Dimensions (WxDxH)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source70 x 96.5 x 98.5 mm
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0 - 40 °C
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source170 mm
Package depthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source120 mm
Package heightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source100 mm
Package weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source515 g

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More camera flash comparisons

All camera flash comparisons