Product comparison · 2 blenders

Philips Daily Collection HL7505/00 blender Tabletop blender vs Philips Daily Collection HR2059/90 blender

Add a product
  • 13specifications compared
  • 7differ
  • 6identical
  • 31known for one product only

Key differences

  • Product colour
    • Daily Collection HL7505/00 blender Tabletop blender:White
    • Daily Collection HR2059/90 blender:Black, Transparent
  • Number of speeds
    • Daily Collection HL7505/00 blender Tabletop blender:3
    • Daily Collection HR2059/90 blender:1
  • Control type
    • Daily Collection HL7505/00 blender Tabletop blender:Rotary
    • Daily Collection HR2059/90 blender:Lever
  • Ice crushing
    • Daily Collection HL7505/00 blender Tabletop blender:No
    • Daily Collection HR2059/90 blender:Yes
  • Material jar(s)
    • Daily Collection HL7505/00 blender Tabletop blender:Stainless steel
    • Daily Collection HR2059/90 blender:Plastic
  • Power
    • Daily Collection HL7505/00 blender Tabletop blender:500 W
    • Daily Collection HR2059/90 blender:450 W
  • Power consumption (typical)
    • Daily Collection HL7505/00 blender Tabletop blender:500 W
    • Daily Collection HR2059/90 blender:450 W

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of HL7505/00, HR2059/90
44 specifications
Features1 differ
Product colourDiffersWhiteBlack, Transparent
Cord lengthKnown for one1.2 mUnknown — not stated by the source
Non-slip feetKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Cord storageKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Detachable lidKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Dishwasher-proof partsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Performance3 differ
Number of speedsDiffers31
Rotational speed (min)Known for one20000 RPMUnknown — not stated by the source
Rotational speed (max)Known for one20000 RPMUnknown — not stated by the source
Control typeDiffersRotaryLever
Ice crushingDiffersNoYes
Variable speedKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Bowl capacityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1 L
JugKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Material1 differ
Housing materialKnown for oneAcrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS)Unknown — not stated by the source
Material jar(s)DiffersStainless steelPlastic
Blending bowl materialKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourcePlastic
Blade materialKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceStainless steel
Overall recyclability rateKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source90%
Power2 differ
PowerDiffers500 W450 W
AC input voltageKnown for one230 VUnknown — not stated by the source
AC input frequencyKnown for one50 HzUnknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (typical)Differs500 W450 W
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WidthKnown for one175 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
DepthKnown for one210 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
HeightKnown for one205 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
WeightKnown for one2.7 kgUnknown — not stated by the source
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one221 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package depthKnown for one357 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one262 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package weightKnown for one3.5 kgUnknown — not stated by the source
Package typeKnown for oneBoxUnknown — not stated by the source
Package dimensions (LxWxH)Known for one357 x 221 x 262 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
User manual recycled paperKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Other featuresidentical
Country of originKnown for oneIndiaUnknown — not stated by the source
Technical detailsidentical
Dangerous goodsKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Packaging recyclability rateKnown for one90%Unknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (max)Known for one500 WUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More blender comparisons

All blender comparisons