Product comparison · 2 blenders

KitchenAid 5KSB5553EOB blender vs Philips Walita Jamie Oliver Hand blender RI1680/00

10specifications compared
8differ
2identical
31known for one product only

Key differences

Type
- 5KSB5553EOB blender:Tabletop blender
- Walita Jamie Oliver Hand blender RI1680/00:Immersion blender
Product colour
- 5KSB5553EOB blender:Black
- Walita Jamie Oliver Hand blender RI1680/00:White
Bowl capacity
- 5KSB5553EOB blender:1.5 L
- Walita Jamie Oliver Hand blender RI1680/00:1 L
Ice crushing
- 5KSB5553EOB blender:Yes
- Walita Jamie Oliver Hand blender RI1680/00:No
Blending bowl material
- 5KSB5553EOB blender:Glass
- Walita Jamie Oliver Hand blender RI1680/00:Metal
Power
- 5KSB5553EOB blender:550 W
- Walita Jamie Oliver Hand blender RI1680/00:650 W
AC input voltage
- 5KSB5553EOB blender:220 - 240 V
- Walita Jamie Oliver Hand blender RI1680/00:220-240 V
AC input frequency
- 5KSB5553EOB blender:50 - 60 Hz
- Walita Jamie Oliver Hand blender RI1680/00:50/60 Hz

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of 5KSB5553EOB, RI1680/00
41 specifications	A KitchenAid 5KSB5553EOB blender Model 5KSB5553EOB View product	B Philips Walita Jamie Oliver Hand blender RI1680/00 Model RI1680/00 View product
Features2 differ
TypeDiffers	Tabletop blender	Immersion blender
Removable bowl	Yes	Yes
Product colourDiffers	Black	White
Colour nameKnown for one	ONYX BLACK	Unknown — not stated by the source
Lid with filling holeKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Easy to cleanKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Cord lengthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1.2 m
BeakerKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1 L
Performance2 differ
Bowl capacityDiffers	1.5 L	1 L
Rotational speed (min)Known for one	4000 RPM	Unknown — not stated by the source
Rotational speed (max)Known for one	11500 RPM	Unknown — not stated by the source
Control typeKnown for one	Buttons	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ice crushingDiffers	Yes	No
JugKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Jug capacityKnown for one	0.75 L	Unknown — not stated by the source
Built-in displayKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Number of speedsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
Pulse functionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
TurboKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
ChopperKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Material1 differ
Blending bowl materialDiffers	Glass	Metal
Blade material	Stainless steel	Stainless steel
Housing materialKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Polypropylene (PP), Rubber
Material jar(s)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	SAN
Power3 differ
PowerDiffers	550 W	650 W
Power sourceKnown for one	AC	Unknown — not stated by the source
AC input voltageDiffers	220 - 240 V	220-240 V
AC input frequencyDiffers	50 - 60 Hz	50/60 Hz
Power consumption (typical)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	650 W
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WidthKnown for one	216 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
DepthKnown for one	232 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
HeightKnown for one	375 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
WeightKnown for one	5.9 kg	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one	257 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package depthKnown for one	280 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one	445 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package weightKnown for one	6.79 kg	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
Stainless steel blade includedKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Recipe bookKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
WhiskKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Other featuresidentical
Country of originKnown for one	United States	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More blender comparisons

All blender comparisons