Product comparison · 2 backup storage devices

Iomega Zip® 750MB FireWire Drive vs Lenovo ZIP Drive 250MB IDE int fTP Ultrabay2000

Key differences

Interface
- Zip® 750MB FireWire Drive:FireWire
- ZIP Drive 250MB IDE int fTP Ultrabay2000:IDE (ATAPI)
Internal
- Zip® 750MB FireWire Drive:No
- ZIP Drive 250MB IDE int fTP Ultrabay2000:Yes
Storage capacity
- Zip® 750MB FireWire Drive:750 MB
- ZIP Drive 250MB IDE int fTP Ultrabay2000:250 MB
Width
- Zip® 750MB FireWire Drive:259 mm
- ZIP Drive 250MB IDE int fTP Ultrabay2000:130 mm
Depth
- Zip® 750MB FireWire Drive:245 mm
- ZIP Drive 250MB IDE int fTP Ultrabay2000:144 mm
Height
- Zip® 750MB FireWire Drive:98 mm
- ZIP Drive 250MB IDE int fTP Ultrabay2000:14 mm

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of Zip® 750MB FireWire Drive, ZIP Drive 250MB IDE int fTP Ultrabay2000
12 specifications	A Iomega Zip® 750MB FireWire Drive View product	B Lenovo ZIP Drive 250MB IDE int fTP Ultrabay2000 View product
Performance3 differ
InterfaceDiffers	FireWire	IDE (ATAPI)
InternalDiffers	No	Yes
Compatible operating systemsDiffers	Windows 98SE/Me/2000/XP Mac OS 9.x - 10x	Microsoft Windows 95; Microsoft Windows 98; Microsoft Windows 2000; Microsoft Windows NT 4.0
Storage1 differ
Storage capacityDiffers	750 MB	250 MB
Data transmissionidentical
Data transfer rateKnown for one	56 Mbit/s	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions3 differ
WidthDiffers	259 mm	130 mm
DepthDiffers	245 mm	144 mm
HeightDiffers	98 mm	14 mm
WeightKnown for one	605 g	Unknown — not stated by the source
Other featuresidentical
Seek timeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	29 ms

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.