Product comparison · 2 backup storage devices

Iomega Zip® 250MB USB-Powered Drive nodisk vs Iomega Zip® 750MB FireWire Drive

Key differences

Interface
- Zip® 250MB USB-Powered Drive nodisk:USB
- Zip® 750MB FireWire Drive:FireWire
Storage capacity
- Zip® 250MB USB-Powered Drive nodisk:250 MB
- Zip® 750MB FireWire Drive:750 MB
Data transfer rate
- Zip® 250MB USB-Powered Drive nodisk:7.2 Mbit/s
- Zip® 750MB FireWire Drive:56 Mbit/s
Width
- Zip® 250MB USB-Powered Drive nodisk:20 mm
- Zip® 750MB FireWire Drive:259 mm
Depth
- Zip® 250MB USB-Powered Drive nodisk:115 mm
- Zip® 750MB FireWire Drive:245 mm
Height
- Zip® 250MB USB-Powered Drive nodisk:170 mm
- Zip® 750MB FireWire Drive:98 mm
Weight
- Zip® 250MB USB-Powered Drive nodisk:525 g
- Zip® 750MB FireWire Drive:605 g

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of Zip® 250MB USB-Powered Drive nodisk, Zip® 750MB FireWire Drive
11 specifications	A Iomega Zip® 250MB USB-Powered Drive nodisk View product	B Iomega Zip® 750MB FireWire Drive View product
Performance2 differ
Product type	Storage drive	Storage drive
Media type	Zip disk	Zip disk
InterfaceDiffers	USB	FireWire
Internal	No	No
Compatible operating systemsDiffers	- Microsoft Windows 95/98/Me/NT/2000/XP & Linux - Mac OS 8.5.1 - 10.2.1+	Windows 98SE/Me/2000/XP Mac OS 9.x - 10x
Storage1 differ
Storage capacityDiffers	250 MB	750 MB
Data transmission1 differ
Data transfer rateDiffers	7.2 Mbit/s	56 Mbit/s
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers	20 mm	259 mm
DepthDiffers	115 mm	245 mm
HeightDiffers	170 mm	98 mm
WeightDiffers	525 g	605 g

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.