Product comparison · 2 backup storage devices

Freecom LTO 448i S-Kit vs Fujitsu FibreCAT TX10 PacketLoader

7specifications compared
6differ
1identical
25known for one product only

Key differences

Native capacity
- LTO 448i S-Kit:200 GB
- FibreCAT TX10 PacketLoader:160 GB
Compressed capacity
- LTO 448i S-Kit:400 GB
- FibreCAT TX10 PacketLoader:320 GB
Power consumption (typical)
- LTO 448i S-Kit:20 W
- FibreCAT TX10 PacketLoader:30 W
Weight
- LTO 448i S-Kit:1.45 kg
- FibreCAT TX10 PacketLoader:10.3 kg
Dimensions (WxDxH)
- LTO 448i S-Kit:146 x 203 x 83 mm
- FibreCAT TX10 PacketLoader:447 x 686 x 44 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of LTO 448i S-Kit, FibreCAT TX10 PacketLoader
32 specifications	A Freecom LTO 448i S-Kit View product	B Fujitsu FibreCAT TX10 PacketLoader View product
Performance1 differ
Product typeDiffers	Storage drive	Storage auto loader & library
Media type	Tape Cartridge	Tape Cartridge
InterfaceKnown for one	Ultra 320 SCSI	Unknown — not stated by the source
InternalKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Data storage typeKnown for one	LTO	Unknown — not stated by the source
Compression ratioKnown for one	2:1	Unknown — not stated by the source
Form factorKnown for one	5.25"	Unknown — not stated by the source
Product colourKnown for one	Black	Unknown — not stated by the source
Mean time between failures (MTBF)Known for one	250000 h	Unknown — not stated by the source
CertificationKnown for one	CSA, TÜV,CE, FCC, NOM, VCCI, C-Tick, RRL, BSMI, GOSH, CB, RoHs, WEEE	Unknown — not stated by the source
Compatible operating systemsKnown for one	Windows (NT, 2000, 2003, XP), NetWare, Linux, MAC OS, Unix, Sun Solaris, Silicon Graphics, IBM AIX	Unknown — not stated by the source
Storage2 differ
Native capacityDiffers	200 GB	160 GB
Compressed capacityDiffers	400 GB	320 GB
Drive device, buffer sizeKnown for one	64 MB	Unknown — not stated by the source
Maximum supported storage capacityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	3.2 TB
Media types supportedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	VXA
Data transmissionidentical
Drive device, transfer rateKnown for one	24 MB/s	Unknown — not stated by the source
Maximum data transfer rateKnown for one	48 Mbit/s	Unknown — not stated by the source
Backup rate compressed performanceKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	86.4 GB/h
Backup rate native performanceKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	43.2 GB/h
Power1 differ
Power consumption (standby)Known for one	13 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (typical)Differs	20 W	30 W
Power supply typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	100~240V @ 50-60Hz
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WeightDiffers	1.45 kg	10.3 kg
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	20 - 80%	Unknown — not stated by the source
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	10 - 95%	Unknown — not stated by the source
Other features1 differ
Data compressionKnown for one	LTO-DC (Enhanced ALDC)	Unknown — not stated by the source
Dimensions (WxDxH)Differs	146 x 203 x 83 mm	447 x 686 x 44 mm
Buffer sizeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	8192 KB
MountingKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1U
I/O portsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2 x 68 pin HD D-Sub (HD-68)
Recording technologyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	VXA-320

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More backup storage device comparisons

All backup storage device comparisons