Product comparison · 2 backup storage devices

Freecom DAT160i 80/160GB USB 2.0 vs Freecom USB DAT-160I S-KIT

Add a product
  • 24specifications compared
  • 1differ
  • 23identical
  • 1known for one product only

Key differences

  • Product colour
    • DAT160i 80/160GB USB 2.0:Black
    • USB DAT-160I S-KIT:Black, White

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of DAT160i 80/160GB USB 2.0, USB DAT-160I S-KIT
25 specifications
Performance1 differ
Product typeStorage driveStorage drive
Media typeTape CartridgeTape Cartridge
InterfaceSCSI 3 Ultra 160 LVD, USB 2.0SCSI 3 Ultra 160 LVD, USB 2.0
InternalYesYes
Data storage typeDDSDDS
Compression ratio2:12:1
Form factor5.25"5.25"
Access time50000 ms50000 ms
Logical recording formatANSI/ECMA DDS-4, DAT 72, DAT 160ANSI/ECMA DDS-4, DAT 72, DAT 160
Product colourDiffersBlackBlack, White
Mean time between failures (MTBF)1000000 h1000000 h
CertificationKnown for onecCSAus Certification to C22.2, No. 60950, TÜV EN60950 (IEC 60950), FCC and CE Declaration of Conformity, C-TICK Approved (AS/NZS CISPR22), VCCI Approved, RRL Approved, BSMI Approved, GOSH ApprovedUnknown — not stated by the source
Storageidentical
Native capacity80 GB80 GB
Compressed capacity160 GB160 GB
Drive device, buffer size16 MB16 MB
Data transmissionidentical
Drive device, transfer rate9.6 MB/s9.6 MB/s
Poweridentical
Power consumption (typical)10.3 W10.3 W
Weight & dimensionsidentical
Weight2.25 kg2.25 kg
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)5 - 40 °C5 - 40 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)-40 - 70 °C-40 - 70 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)20 - 80%20 - 80%
Storage relative humidity (H-H)5 - 95%5 - 95%
Other featuresidentical
Data compressionDCLZDCLZ
Dimensions (WxDxH)181 x 236 x 67 mm181 x 236 x 67 mm
Write methods8 mm helical scan8 mm helical scan

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More backup storage device comparisons

All backup storage device comparisons