Product comparison · 2 backup storage devices

Freecom DAT-160i S-Kit vs Freecom SCSI DAT-160i

Add a product
  • 11specifications compared
  • 2differ
  • 9identical
  • 14known for one product only

Key differences

  • Product colour
    • DAT-160i S-Kit:Black, White
    • SCSI DAT-160i:Black

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of DAT-160i S-Kit, SCSI DAT-160i
25 specifications
Performance2 differ
InterfaceDiffersSCSI 3 Ultra 160 LVDSCSI 3 Ultra 160 LVD, USB 2.0
Access timeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source50 ms
Logical recording formatKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceANSI/ECMA DDS-4, DAT 72, DAT 160
Product colourDiffersBlack, WhiteBlack
Storage media types supportedKnown for oneDAT72Unknown — not stated by the source
Storageidentical
Drive device, buffer sizeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source16 MB
Poweridentical
Power requirementsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source100 - 240 VAC, 50-60 Hz
Power consumption (typical)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source10.3 W
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source5 - 40 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source-40 - 70 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source20 - 80%
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source5 - 95%
Other featuresidentical
Data compressionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceLempel-Ziv (DCLZ)
Recording technologyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source8 mm
Data transmissionidentical
Sustained data transfer rate (compressed)Known for one13.8 MB/sUnknown — not stated by the source
Sustained data transfer rate (native)Known for one6.9 MB/sUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More backup storage device comparisons

All backup storage device comparisons