All categories
Phones & WearablesView all 31

Departments

Phones & WearablesComputers & TabletsComponents & StorageNetworkingPrinting & OfficePower & ChargingTV, Audio & VideoGaming, Toys & RobotsKitchen AppliancesHome AppliancesPersonal Care & HealthSmart Home & SecurityCar & MobilityTools & GardenCameras & Photo

Shopping country

Browse

All categoriesCompare products

Product comparison · 2 backup storage devices

Acer LTO-2 200/400GB tape drive vs Fujitsu VXA-320 160GB Tape Drive

Add a product
  • 10specifications compared
  • 4differ
  • 6identical
  • 5known for one product only

Key differences

The Acer LTO-2 200/400GB tape drive has 40 GB more native capacity than the Fujitsu VXA-320 160GB Tape Drive (200 GB vs 160 GB). The Acer LTO-2 200/400GB tape drive has 80 GB more compressed capacity than the Fujitsu VXA-320 160GB Tape Drive (400 GB vs 320 GB). Interface: Ultra160 SCSI on the Acer LTO-2 200/400GB tape drive, SCSI on the Fujitsu VXA-320 160GB Tape Drive. Data storage type: LTO on the Acer LTO-2 200/400GB tape drive, VXA on the Fujitsu VXA-320 160GB Tape Drive.

  • Interface
    • Ultra160 SCSI
    • SCSI
  • Data storage type
    • LTO
    • VXA
  • Native capacity
    • 200 GB
    • 160 GB
  • Compressed capacity
    • 400 GB
    • 320 GB

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only
15 specifications
A

Acer

LTO-2 200/400GB tape driveView product
B

Fujitsu

VXA-320 160GB Tape DriveView product
Performance2 differ
InterfaceDiffersUltra160 SCSISCSI
Data storage typeDiffersLTOVXA
Storage2 differ
Native capacityDiffers200 GB160 GB
Compressed capacityDiffers400 GB320 GB
Media types supportedKnown for oneVXA
Data transmissionidentical
Sustained data transfer rate (compressed)Known for one24 MB/s
Sustained data transfer rate (native)Known for one12 MB/s
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WeightKnown for one1 kg
Other featuresidentical
Dimensions (WxDxH)Known for one146 x 203 x 42 mm

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More backup storage device comparisons

All backup storage device comparisons