Product comparison · 2 backup storage devices

Acer AIT Tape Drive vs Fujitsu LTO1HH Ultrium

Key differences

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of AIT Tape Drive, LTO1HH Ultrium
22 specifications	A Acer AIT Tape Drive View product	B Fujitsu LTO1HH Ultrium View product
Performance2 differ
Data storage typeDiffers	AIT	LTO
Compression ratioDiffers	2.6:1	2:1
Form factorKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5.25" Half-height
Mean time between failures (MTBF)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	250000 h
CertificationKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	EN 60950, EN 55022 Class B, EN 55024, CE
Storage2 differ
Native capacityDiffers	80 GB	200 GB
Compressed capacityDiffers	208 GB	400 GB
Drive device, buffer sizeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	64 MB
Media types supportedKnown for one	AIT-2	Unknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
Power consumption (standby)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	9 W
Power consumption (typical)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	18 W
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WeightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1.4 kg
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	10 - 40 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	-30 - 60 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	20 - 80%
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5 - 90%
Other featuresidentical
Dimensions (WxDxH)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	146 x 214 x 41.3 mm

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.