Product comparison · 2 activity trackers

MEDION LIFE GPS Sporthorloge S2400 vs Samsung SM-R370NZKATPA activity tracker AMOLED Wristband activity tracker

Add a product
  • 10specifications compared
  • 4differ
  • 6identical
  • 26known for one product only

Key differences

The Samsung SM-R370NZKATPA activity tracker AMOLED Wristband activity tracker has 1 more Bluetooth version than the MEDION LIFE GPS Sporthorloge S2400 (5.0 vs 4.0). Display diagonal: 3.3 cm (1.3") on the MEDION LIFE GPS Sporthorloge S2400, 2.41 cm (0.95") on the Samsung SM-R370NZKATPA activity tracker AMOLED Wristband activity tracker. Form factor: Round on the MEDION LIFE GPS Sporthorloge S2400, Rectangle on the Samsung SM-R370NZKATPA activity tracker AMOLED Wristband activity tracker. Battery life: 5 day(s) on the MEDION LIFE GPS Sporthorloge S2400, 11 day(s) on the Samsung SM-R370NZKATPA activity tracker AMOLED Wristband activity tracker.

  • Display diagonal
    • LIFE GPS Sporthorloge S2400:3.3 cm (1.3")
    • SM-R370NZKATPA activity tracker AMOLED Wristband activity tracker:2.41 cm (0.95")
  • Form factor
    • LIFE GPS Sporthorloge S2400:Round
    • SM-R370NZKATPA activity tracker AMOLED Wristband activity tracker:Rectangle
  • Bluetooth version
    • LIFE GPS Sporthorloge S2400:4.0
    • SM-R370NZKATPA activity tracker AMOLED Wristband activity tracker:5.0
  • Battery life
    • LIFE GPS Sporthorloge S2400:5 day(s)
    • SM-R370NZKATPA activity tracker AMOLED Wristband activity tracker:11 day(s)

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of LIFE GPS Sporthorloge S2400, SM-R370NZKATPA
36 specifications
Performance1 differ
Display typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceAMOLED
Display diagonalDiffers3.3 cm (1.3")2.41 cm (0.95")
Display resolutionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source120 x 240 pixels
Colour displayYesYes
Number of coloursKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source16 M
RAM capacityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0.001953 GB
ROM capacityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source32 MB
Design1 differ
Device typeWristband activity trackerWristband activity tracker
Form factorDiffersRoundRectangle
Product colourBlackBlack
Band colourBlackBlack
International Protection (IP) codeKnown for oneIP68Unknown — not stated by the source
Featuresidentical
Heart rate monitorYesYes
Active minutesKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Distance travelledKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
PedometerYesYes
Hours sleptKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Quality of sleepKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Workout trackingKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Vibrating motorKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
AccelerometerKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
GyroscopeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Vibrating alertKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
GPS (satellite)Known for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfaces1 differ
BluetoothKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Bluetooth versionDiffers4.05.0
Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE)Known for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Wi-FiKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Near Field Communication (NFC)Known for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
Battery lifeDiffers5 day(s)11 day(s)
Batteryidentical
Battery capacityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source120 mAh
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WeightKnown for one64 gUnknown — not stated by the source
WidthKnown for one46 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
DepthKnown for one16 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
ThicknessKnown for one5.8 cmUnknown — not stated by the source
System requirementsidentical
Mobile operating systems supportedKnown for oneAndroid, iOSUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More activity tracker comparisons

All activity tracker comparisons