Product comparison · 2 activity trackers

Hama Fit Track 1900 vs Samsung SM-R370NZKAXFA activity tracker AMOLED

4specifications compared
2differ
2identical
9known for one product only

Key differences

Display type
- Fit Track 1900:OLED
- SM-R370NZKAXFA activity tracker AMOLED:AMOLED
Display diagonal
- Fit Track 1900:2.18 cm (0.86")
- SM-R370NZKAXFA activity tracker AMOLED:2.41 cm (0.95")

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of Fit Track 1900, SM-R370NZKAXFA
13 specifications	A Hama Fit Track 1900 View product	B Samsung SM-R370NZKAXFA activity tracker AMOLED Model SM-R370NZKAXFA View product
Performance2 differ
Display typeDiffers	OLED	AMOLED
Display diagonalDiffers	2.18 cm (0.86")	2.41 cm (0.95")
TouchscreenKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Designidentical
Device typeKnown for one	Armband activity tracker	Unknown — not stated by the source
Form factor	Rectangle	Rectangle
Product colour	Black	Black
International Protection (IP) codeKnown for one	IP65	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensionsidentical
Package widthKnown for one	60 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package depthKnown for one	75 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one	795 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package weightKnown for one	75 g	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfacesidentical
BluetoothKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Other featuresidentical
Connectivity technologyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Wireless

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More activity tracker comparisons

All activity tracker comparisons