Product comparison · 2 activity trackers

Hama Fit Track 1900 vs Hama Fit Track 3900

11specifications compared
6differ
5identical
0known for one product only

Key differences

Display type
- Fit Track 1900:OLED
- Fit Track 3900:LCD
Display diagonal
- Fit Track 1900:2.18 cm (0.86")
- Fit Track 3900:2.44 cm (0.96")
International Protection (IP) code
- Fit Track 1900:IP65
- Fit Track 3900:IP67
Package width
- Fit Track 1900:60 mm
- Fit Track 3900:195 mm
Package height
- Fit Track 1900:795 mm
- Fit Track 3900:60 mm
Package weight
- Fit Track 1900:75 g
- Fit Track 3900:179 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of Fit Track 1900, Fit Track 3900
11 specifications	A Hama Fit Track 1900 View product	B Hama Fit Track 3900 View product
Performance2 differ
Display typeDiffers	OLED	LCD
Display diagonalDiffers	2.18 cm (0.86")	2.44 cm (0.96")
Design1 differ
International Protection (IP) codeDiffers	IP65	IP67
Weight & dimensions3 differ
Package widthDiffers	60 mm	195 mm
Package heightDiffers	795 mm	60 mm
Package weightDiffers	75 g	179 g

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More activity tracker comparisons

All activity tracker comparisons